Emailcash.com.au

How thrilling, I just made $1 on email cash.
I spent 10 mins doing a survey just to make $1.
You know why I did this... because I joined email cash about 4 years ago and you need to have $30 cash to get a cheque sent to you.
You know how much I have made from email cash in the 4 years I've been a member (inc. the $1)
$22.88
I'm sooooo close now... Only 2 more years and I should be able to get my $30 check from them!

And you know what I really will keep going till I get that $30 dammit coz I really believe I deserve it just for signing up in the first place!

Luring in the innocent

Fucking Scientologists! Need I say more?
Not enough that they try and lure people off the street now they are luring in teens by staging a "Human right forum" which was more of a ploy to let them know about Scientology.
Makes me sick! It really truly does!

Ohhhh shock horror...


Anthony Callea has officially come out as being gay.

Wooooppp deeeeee fuck! Is there anyone who serioulsy thought the guy was straight?

Good on him for comming out and all but bring on some real news dammit! This is hardly shocking!

Boobs...

Is all I can say when I see the recent pics of Paris Hilton on X17online (which means I now have to publicly admit I do look at this trashy site from time to time *insert embarrassed smiley here*)

How plastic does she look in the second shot down?!?!

I really hope she wasn't hoping they would look natural to the public eye considering we have all seen her rather famous nocturnal activities video!

PS... yes I'm a bad bad girl for neglecting my blog, but I haven't been getting into the new much this last couple of weeks since Mr Mr wont watch ANYTHING but Thomas the gay engine and Telli-Turds at the moment *insert unimpressed smiley here* hehehe

One fine looking cat!


Neofelis diardi: New species of clouded leopard found in Indonesia
Photo: Reuters


Stupidity by the bucket load

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/03/14/1173722560437.html?from=top5

Did this woman seriously think she would be employable in the airline industry after she came out saying she slept with a customer (wheather they be famous or not) in a toilet cubical while she was working?!?!?!

Maybe she just thought that sleeping with a celeb would give her millions (as opposed to the $120K that she is still yet to receive for her story)

Blech, stupidity is the only word I can think of here.


Am I the only one who thinks this little piggy is kinda cute if you look at it long enough?

Conservapedia

I'm not terribly trusting of everything in Wikipedia, due to the fact that the site is open to be edited freely. But this certainly isn't the alternative I would have thought to look for if I had not read about it in the The Age this morning:
Conservapedia

Just looking at the first article I could find on the site, I have found in the first para solid evidence that this site is probably even more unreliable than good old Wiki.

This para is trying to convince me that abortion will cause breast cancer. Quote...
The vast majority of scientific studies have shown that abortion causes an increase in breast cancer, including 16 out of 17 statistically significant studies. Studies showing that abortion increases breast cancer predate the political controversy.

That line is all good and well, but lets read on to the the second half of the para...

It is undisputed that having a baby protects against breast cancer, and thus early termination of pregnancy must increase the risk of cancer for the mother compared to carrying that same pregnancy to birth. Yet the abortion industry conceals this increased risk, just as the tobacco industry concealed its cancer risk for decades.

Now this is the part of their opening para that has destroyed their credibility for me. Okay maybe I'm looking into the wording too much but please note my highlighting of the word "must". One only needs to do some reading about critical thinking and analysis of arguments to see that this is an argument with no real validity just due to the use of that one word.
When someone is saying something must they generally don't have any concrete evidence to back this up. And reading on they don't present me with any concrete evidence!
Then there is their comparison of the abortion industry being comparable to the tobacco industry in their concealment of this medical "fact" that they are talking about.
Now I'm not about to start any kind of debate on abortion, its a subject I prefer to leave alone, but I have not seen this 'fact' covered up. I have read about the possibility of an increased risk of breast cancer in these cases and have also seen that its not concrete fact, only possible. But its just a great example of how skewed the site is and will be on certain topics.

Oh and just looking at their references for this particular piece I found one entitled "Self-checks 'useless' in breast cancer fight" WTF?!?! I am so not going to start on that one.
I'm just going to stop here or I may never stop poking holes in this site. I seriously hope that the predictions of the site creator are wrong and that this site will not form a valid and standard point of reference for American schools in the future. No offence intended but do American children really need this craziness in their minds?

My Blog List

.

Emailcash.com.au
5:49 pm | Author: Chazz
How thrilling, I just made $1 on email cash.
I spent 10 mins doing a survey just to make $1.
You know why I did this... because I joined email cash about 4 years ago and you need to have $30 cash to get a cheque sent to you.
You know how much I have made from email cash in the 4 years I've been a member (inc. the $1)
$22.88
I'm sooooo close now... Only 2 more years and I should be able to get my $30 check from them!

And you know what I really will keep going till I get that $30 dammit coz I really believe I deserve it just for signing up in the first place!
Luring in the innocent
9:56 am | Author: Chazz
Fucking Scientologists! Need I say more?
Not enough that they try and lure people off the street now they are luring in teens by staging a "Human right forum" which was more of a ploy to let them know about Scientology.
Makes me sick! It really truly does!
Ohhhh shock horror...
8:06 am | Author: Chazz

Anthony Callea has officially come out as being gay.

Wooooppp deeeeee fuck! Is there anyone who serioulsy thought the guy was straight?

Good on him for comming out and all but bring on some real news dammit! This is hardly shocking!
Boobs...
4:38 pm | Author: Chazz
Is all I can say when I see the recent pics of Paris Hilton on X17online (which means I now have to publicly admit I do look at this trashy site from time to time *insert embarrassed smiley here*)

How plastic does she look in the second shot down?!?!

I really hope she wasn't hoping they would look natural to the public eye considering we have all seen her rather famous nocturnal activities video!

PS... yes I'm a bad bad girl for neglecting my blog, but I haven't been getting into the new much this last couple of weeks since Mr Mr wont watch ANYTHING but Thomas the gay engine and Telli-Turds at the moment *insert unimpressed smiley here* hehehe
One fine looking cat!
10:01 am | Author: Chazz

Neofelis diardi: New species of clouded leopard found in Indonesia
Photo: Reuters


Stupidity by the bucket load
3:51 pm | Author: Chazz
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/03/14/1173722560437.html?from=top5

Did this woman seriously think she would be employable in the airline industry after she came out saying she slept with a customer (wheather they be famous or not) in a toilet cubical while she was working?!?!?!

Maybe she just thought that sleeping with a celeb would give her millions (as opposed to the $120K that she is still yet to receive for her story)

Blech, stupidity is the only word I can think of here.
9:13 pm | Author: Chazz

Am I the only one who thinks this little piggy is kinda cute if you look at it long enough?
Conservapedia
8:29 am | Author: Chazz
I'm not terribly trusting of everything in Wikipedia, due to the fact that the site is open to be edited freely. But this certainly isn't the alternative I would have thought to look for if I had not read about it in the The Age this morning:
Conservapedia

Just looking at the first article I could find on the site, I have found in the first para solid evidence that this site is probably even more unreliable than good old Wiki.

This para is trying to convince me that abortion will cause breast cancer. Quote...
The vast majority of scientific studies have shown that abortion causes an increase in breast cancer, including 16 out of 17 statistically significant studies. Studies showing that abortion increases breast cancer predate the political controversy.

That line is all good and well, but lets read on to the the second half of the para...

It is undisputed that having a baby protects against breast cancer, and thus early termination of pregnancy must increase the risk of cancer for the mother compared to carrying that same pregnancy to birth. Yet the abortion industry conceals this increased risk, just as the tobacco industry concealed its cancer risk for decades.

Now this is the part of their opening para that has destroyed their credibility for me. Okay maybe I'm looking into the wording too much but please note my highlighting of the word "must". One only needs to do some reading about critical thinking and analysis of arguments to see that this is an argument with no real validity just due to the use of that one word.
When someone is saying something must they generally don't have any concrete evidence to back this up. And reading on they don't present me with any concrete evidence!
Then there is their comparison of the abortion industry being comparable to the tobacco industry in their concealment of this medical "fact" that they are talking about.
Now I'm not about to start any kind of debate on abortion, its a subject I prefer to leave alone, but I have not seen this 'fact' covered up. I have read about the possibility of an increased risk of breast cancer in these cases and have also seen that its not concrete fact, only possible. But its just a great example of how skewed the site is and will be on certain topics.

Oh and just looking at their references for this particular piece I found one entitled "Self-checks 'useless' in breast cancer fight" WTF?!?! I am so not going to start on that one.
I'm just going to stop here or I may never stop poking holes in this site. I seriously hope that the predictions of the site creator are wrong and that this site will not form a valid and standard point of reference for American schools in the future. No offence intended but do American children really need this craziness in their minds?

Emailcash.com.au

How thrilling, I just made $1 on email cash.
I spent 10 mins doing a survey just to make $1.
You know why I did this... because I joined email cash about 4 years ago and you need to have $30 cash to get a cheque sent to you.
You know how much I have made from email cash in the 4 years I've been a member (inc. the $1)
$22.88
I'm sooooo close now... Only 2 more years and I should be able to get my $30 check from them!

And you know what I really will keep going till I get that $30 dammit coz I really believe I deserve it just for signing up in the first place!

Luring in the innocent

Fucking Scientologists! Need I say more?
Not enough that they try and lure people off the street now they are luring in teens by staging a "Human right forum" which was more of a ploy to let them know about Scientology.
Makes me sick! It really truly does!

Ohhhh shock horror...


Anthony Callea has officially come out as being gay.

Wooooppp deeeeee fuck! Is there anyone who serioulsy thought the guy was straight?

Good on him for comming out and all but bring on some real news dammit! This is hardly shocking!

Boobs...

Is all I can say when I see the recent pics of Paris Hilton on X17online (which means I now have to publicly admit I do look at this trashy site from time to time *insert embarrassed smiley here*)

How plastic does she look in the second shot down?!?!

I really hope she wasn't hoping they would look natural to the public eye considering we have all seen her rather famous nocturnal activities video!

PS... yes I'm a bad bad girl for neglecting my blog, but I haven't been getting into the new much this last couple of weeks since Mr Mr wont watch ANYTHING but Thomas the gay engine and Telli-Turds at the moment *insert unimpressed smiley here* hehehe

One fine looking cat!


Neofelis diardi: New species of clouded leopard found in Indonesia
Photo: Reuters


Stupidity by the bucket load

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/03/14/1173722560437.html?from=top5

Did this woman seriously think she would be employable in the airline industry after she came out saying she slept with a customer (wheather they be famous or not) in a toilet cubical while she was working?!?!?!

Maybe she just thought that sleeping with a celeb would give her millions (as opposed to the $120K that she is still yet to receive for her story)

Blech, stupidity is the only word I can think of here.


Am I the only one who thinks this little piggy is kinda cute if you look at it long enough?

Conservapedia

I'm not terribly trusting of everything in Wikipedia, due to the fact that the site is open to be edited freely. But this certainly isn't the alternative I would have thought to look for if I had not read about it in the The Age this morning:
Conservapedia

Just looking at the first article I could find on the site, I have found in the first para solid evidence that this site is probably even more unreliable than good old Wiki.

This para is trying to convince me that abortion will cause breast cancer. Quote...
The vast majority of scientific studies have shown that abortion causes an increase in breast cancer, including 16 out of 17 statistically significant studies. Studies showing that abortion increases breast cancer predate the political controversy.

That line is all good and well, but lets read on to the the second half of the para...

It is undisputed that having a baby protects against breast cancer, and thus early termination of pregnancy must increase the risk of cancer for the mother compared to carrying that same pregnancy to birth. Yet the abortion industry conceals this increased risk, just as the tobacco industry concealed its cancer risk for decades.

Now this is the part of their opening para that has destroyed their credibility for me. Okay maybe I'm looking into the wording too much but please note my highlighting of the word "must". One only needs to do some reading about critical thinking and analysis of arguments to see that this is an argument with no real validity just due to the use of that one word.
When someone is saying something must they generally don't have any concrete evidence to back this up. And reading on they don't present me with any concrete evidence!
Then there is their comparison of the abortion industry being comparable to the tobacco industry in their concealment of this medical "fact" that they are talking about.
Now I'm not about to start any kind of debate on abortion, its a subject I prefer to leave alone, but I have not seen this 'fact' covered up. I have read about the possibility of an increased risk of breast cancer in these cases and have also seen that its not concrete fact, only possible. But its just a great example of how skewed the site is and will be on certain topics.

Oh and just looking at their references for this particular piece I found one entitled "Self-checks 'useless' in breast cancer fight" WTF?!?! I am so not going to start on that one.
I'm just going to stop here or I may never stop poking holes in this site. I seriously hope that the predictions of the site creator are wrong and that this site will not form a valid and standard point of reference for American schools in the future. No offence intended but do American children really need this craziness in their minds?